- Summary
The concept of globalization is
multidimensional, accelerated and interconnected organization of space and time
across national borders. Political globalization has been much discussed in the
globalization literature.
There can be little doubt that
one of the most pervasive forms of political globalization is the worldwide
spread of democracy. However, since the collapse of the Soviet Union and the
end of the communist regimes in Europe after 1991, democracy has become the
universally acceptable form of government.
Nation-states continue to be
powerful actors but exist in a more globally connected world that they do not
fully control. Nation-states continues to be the principal political form of
societal organization. The two powerful Nations in the world today are the United
States and China.
A second dimension of political
globalization refers to the rise of a global normative culture. This is
independent of geopolitics.
The concept of civil society is
much contested and for present purposes it simply refers to the political
domain between the state and the market.
The global is not outside the
social world but is inside it in numerous ways. So, it is possible to see
political communication in the public sphere as increasingly framed by global
issues.
Global civil society is not
defined in relation to a state. NGO-led political campaigns, trans border
social movements. The globalization of civil society follows the same pattern
as for democracy, the nation-state and citizenship.
To conclude, political globalization
has resulted in complex relationships between three dimensions. The
globalization of the nation-state, global normative culture, polycentric networks,
and the development of global civil society.
2. Interesting things what I learned
2. Interesting things what I learned
Despite of changed world, the “notion of the decline of the nation-state
in a post-statist world of governance without government” seems to be replaced by idea of the continued
transformation of nation-state. In case of Europeanization, as a movement that
has led to the progressive erosion of national sovereignty, has paradoxically
rescued the nation-state rather than undermined it. Per Majone (1996) the
transnationalization of the state in Europe is best seen in terms of regulatory
kind of governance rather than the creation of a new state system that
challenges the nation-state. Moreover, recent Brexit and crisis in Syria enhanced
Isolationism in Europe.
3. Discussion
The UK Decides to Leave European
Union and Donald Trump has been elected president of the United States. The
norm of non-intervention seems dominated the majority all around the world.
Will nation-states continue to remain as powerful actors in the future?
No comments:
Post a Comment