1) Summarize
Globalization
is an essentially contested concept. A strong characteristic of the currency of
the concept is the cleavage between people who take a mainly economic position
on globalization and other people who have a broader viewpoint. As anti-capitalistic
globalization grew rapidly, the movement itself is one of the globalization
process. People thought that the most important single defining feature of globalization
is that of increasing connectivity (or interconnectedness). Thus, for people
who think of globalization as being pivoted upon this, little attention is
given directly to what could, be considered as a combination of both subjective
and cultural factors. Seeming failure to acknowledge fully the cultural aspect
of globalization can now clearly be seen as a very costly mistake from the
perspective of globalization theory.
There are
three major dimensions on globalization. They’re economic, the political and
the cultural. Because of the economic globalization, the cultural dimension has
come increasingly to the fore partly. When referring to the social dimension,
we are including the communicative. Culture includes the environmental concern.
We should keep in mind there’s no dimension that is more important than the
other. According to Wallerstein’s point of view, over the past five or six
hundred years, the present world-system has been produced mainly by the
expansion of capitalism. Wallerstein regards it as now being increasingly
challenged by anti-systemic movements. We are constrained to think of the
overall process of globalization in a more multifaceted way as far as we have
rejected the unidimensional, economic approach to globalization,
The problem
precipitating the concept of glocalization was the relationship between the
global and the local. Attempting to characterize globalization will be followed.
Two major directional tendencies on globalizations are increasing global
connectivity and increasing global consciousness. And also like the operations of
the UN, globalization is focused upon four reference: nation-states, world
politics, individuals, and humankind. Globalization has a particular form to
all intents and purposes, consummated by the founding of the United Nations
organization. At last, globalization is constituted by sides of life.
They’re the cultural, the social, the political and the economic. In real
situations, they’re intertwined. In some situations, one or more aspects are
more prominent. In modern society, the cultural
and the economic are closely interpenetrative.
To conduct
effective and plausible critical analysis, the attainment of ever more
sophisticated frameworks for the very discussion of globalization is required. Undisciplined
critique is dangerous in the way that globalization
simply can become negative fad words, something to employ as a source
of blame for each and every problem. In spite of much rigorous elaboration of
globalization theory recently, we still unfortunately see a lot of such
indulgence around us.
2)
Interesting items I learned
Glocalization.
We
learned the term ‘Glocalization’ and shared ideas and thoughts about it during
our class before. After I read this article, I could understand it more clearly
and specifically. I thought this word ‘Glocalization’ in positive view because
its dictionary definition
is not that bad. However, after reading this article, I thought there can be
many arguments about this term and related issues. I think ‘glocalization’ can
be somewhat violent to certain countries and cultures such as developing
countries. I can’t recognize it before. I was impressed that relation between
the global and the local is important thing when discuss glocalization.
3) Discussion
point
The writer
mentioned “There is a particularly significant set of ramifications of the
concept of glocalization. This has to do with the ways in which one might
sensibly answer the question: What happens after globalization?”. And the
writer also said there can be no criterion as a fully globalized world might
look like. Then, I think an ideal or an expected glocalization is diverse and
reflected by one’s view and intention points about
globalization. Although we discussed similar questions, I don’t think we talk about it
directly. I wonder other students’ thoughts and want to discuss view on
globalization combined glocalization in our class.
No comments:
Post a Comment