Economic Globalization: Corporation
Summary
We live in the
world that global corporations are increasing. Global corporations have created
vast business as a world scale. We can define a modern TNC(transnational
corporation) as ‘a firm which has the power to coordinate and control
operations in more than one country, even if it does not own them’. What TNCs
all have in common is that they operate in different political, social and
cultural environments. The vast majority of the world’s TNCs originate from the
developed economies. Moreover, a much smaller number of very large TNCs are
carrying out most international productions.
Although there
are complex reasons why business firms extend their operations outside their
home countries, we can pay attention two broad categories: market-oriented
investment and asset-oriented investment. In the point of market-oriented
investment view : Because much of investment continues to be market-oriented, increasing
profitability may well depend on possibility to expand its market beyond its original(home)
territory. Both for political and cultural reasons, TNC may be desirable to stay
in a local market: such as transportation costs, political regulatory
structures and so on. In the point of asset-oriented investment view : There
are 2 reasons for transnational investment. First, geographical unevenness is
that. Second, the assets needed to produce and sell products and services are
also geographically very unevenly distributed. Also, TNCs can shift their
activities and operations boundaries according to changes of labour costs.
There are two
major ways how firms develop transnational activities. one is ‘greenfield’
investment: building totally new facilities. It’s risky. The other is the
engagement with other firms, through either M&A or other forms of strategic
collaboration. Recently, most of the growth in world FDI(foreign direct
investment) has been driven by M&A. Moreover, both developments in
transportation and communications technologies, as well as in production
process technologies, have increased the ability to access other unevenly
distributed assets on increasingly wide geographical scales.
Unlike M&A,
strategic alliances are usually used when solving specific business problems.
Nevertheless, the proliferation of such alliances has greatly increased the
complexity and variety of TNC operations in the world economy.
Place and
geography still matter fundamentally in the ways firms are made and in how they
behave.
The TNC’s origin
place has the dominant influence. Empirical research represents how Japanese
and US electronics firms have distinctively different ways of organizing their
regional production networks, differences that clearly reflect their different
home characteristics. On the contrary, interconnectedness in the contemporary
global economy means that influences are rapidly transmitted across boundaries.
It will also affect the way business organizations are configured and behave. For
that, involvement in the global economy is forcing firms to modify several
their practices.
Also, it is
reinforced by regional political structures such as EU or NAFTA.
Transnational
production networks are complex and dynamic. It creates tensions between TNCs
and states, local communities, labour, consumers, civil society organizations.
We can notice TNCs’ powerful influences in the global economy, but we should
know that they don’t always prevail and have absolute power.
New, Interesting items learned
Due to
globalization in economy, corporations can handle matters with more possible
choices from the ‘make or buy’ decision that means the firm’s decision on what
to produce for itself and what to externalize to independent suppliers to any
other numerous problems. Moreover, TNCs usually develop distinctive spatial
patterns for each corporations’ functions. Corporations can choose from more
detailed variations. It’s interesting and I think management of corporations is
increasingly complex.
Finally, I have
studied globalization in 4 dimensions during completing blogging. After that, I
can’t convince some situations and matters because I know I can see them in
many various view but I can certainly recognize that matters in globalization
are affected by interactions between internal and external things. I think
tensions between them are critical points to study globalization.
Discussion point
I
studied some regulations related to FTA when I took the international trade
class. I also studied M&A, strategic alliances and other methods when
taking management class. So, this article is more interesting for me because I
can extend my knowledge. As I mentioned above, I think the tension is most
important thing when studying and understanding globalization. For that reason,
I wonder the balance between protective trades and free trades with other
countries in economy. Is it possible that we can balance between them? Or, we
can think that what is better. In the case of Korea, agricultural products are
more preserve than any other thing when we trade. I studied that one of reasons
for that is about national security in terms of food. Although It’s rational,
other countries feel anger for our seal. I also know that we can’t remain
restrictions in that way. Anyway, I want to share other thoughts about this
matter and study more deeply.
No comments:
Post a Comment